The Ming Scholar’s Garden of the Astor Court

THE ASTOR COURT
Researched by Rochelle Almeida

Why is this space called the Astor Court?
The space usually referred to as The Astor Court is actually a Chinese Ming Scholar’s Garden but is so called because it was made possible by an endowment from Mrs. Brooke Astor.

Who is Brooke Astor?
Brooke Astor, a trustee of the MMA was one of the moving forces in the 1970s behind the reinstallation of the permanent galleries for Asian Art. She herself had lived in Peking, China, from the age of five until ten and had fond memories of tranquil gardens courts within the crowded city. It was she who suggested that a space of this kind should be included as a place of respite and contemplation for those visiting the conventional Asian galleries.

Significance and Meaning of Yin and Yang in Chinese Garden Courts:
The entire space exemplifies the importance of the Chinese concept of yin and yang (pronounced yong). This is basically a conceptualization of the world that underlies much Chinese thought and art.  It recognizes the duality and the contrast in the nature of all things.  Let’s look at some of the elements that embody this duality and the contrasts:

Moon Gate:

Even before you enter the garden, you must pass through what is called the Moon Gate. This is partly rounded and partly straight. It is made partly of dark stone and partly of light.  As it draws you inside, it reveals only a small part of the interior.  It frames a rectangular doorway (another contrast of shapes) through which successive spaces defined by colonnades and an alternating pattern of light and dark might be seen.  The plaque just above the doorway in Chinese calligraphy reads: In Search of Quietude.

Now that we are inside the garden, let us examine some of the main elements that make up its composition:

Materials and Construction and History of the Installation:
All the materials used in this court are native to China from the wood of the covered promenade and pavilion, to the flooring, rocks and plants. Skilled craftsmen created each individual component and then a team of 27 Chinese engineers were brought to his country to carry out the installation. They took five months, from January to May of 1980 to assemble this space, and then returned to China. No nails at all were used in the structures or in the furniture within the Reception Room.  The hallmark of ancient Chinese wood construction which used complex joinery instead of hammers and nails were used to create these structures.
There are four kinds of wood used in the Astor Court.  The lattice and railings of the Ming Room are of gingko and camphor; the beams are of fir.  Nan Wood, a rare species of broadleaf evergeen was used for the pillars of the walkway. Impervious to insects, Nan wood is prized for its durability and beautiful honey brown color.

Historic Influences on the Design on the Astor Court:
The design of the court is based on a small courtyard within a scholar’s garden in the city of Soozhou (pronounced Soo-Jho) in the scenic lake district, an affluent city on the Grand Canal.  This is how the court would have looked during the latter part of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), circa 1634. The Soozhou garden was called Wang Shi Yuan, the Garden of the Master of the Fishing Nets.

What is meant by the term “Scholar” in this context?
A scholar was an official of the court. His professional life was difficult and short-lived. He was required to uphold the Confucian ideal of unswerving loyalty to the sovereign, including the responsibility to speak frankly and criticize other scholars.  At the same time, this might be viewed as treason and be punishable by death.  Hence, the scholar had to walk a fine line between observing and commenting on the regime without antagonizing anyone. Little wonder that for escape from his stressful life, he would turn for contemplation and serenity to his garden.

Alignment:
The Astor Court is laid out on a north-south axis as it would have been in China.

What do we see in a Classical Chinese Garden Court?
A Scholar’s Garden always includes five elements: Architecture, Rocks, Plants, Water and Calligraphy or Literature.

Architecture:
This court has three typical garden structures: a covered walkway, a half-pavilion along the west wall, and a small reception hall called The Ming Room, where the Scholar would receive his visitors and be able to gaze upon his garden.

Walkway: The symmetry of the court is broken up by the pillars of the walkway on one side. Notice that this walkway  is not straight, but involves a slight curvature which suggests that there is no straight path through life.

Half-Pavillion: This pavilion is made of tiles that came to us from China. A plaque above the vertical rock gives us its name: Cold Spring Pavillion, taking its name from the nearby pool.  It is called the Beautiful Lady Pavillion.

The Ming Room: The moon watching terrace, what we call the Ming Room, is filled with magnificent 15th and 16th century Ming furniture and objects. It faces south, as does the most important seat within—that of the Scholar himself.

These are elements of architecture in the design.

Rocks:
These  are found all over the garden and are central to Chinese landscapes. Rocks are seen in Chinese paintings, appearing as early as the 8th century. The term “scholar’s rock” is used to describe rocks of a distinctive shape, texture and color that were considered appropriate for display in a scholar’s studio. Rocks are replete with representational, symbolic and magical importance, evoking the grandeur of nature. A “good” rock reminds the viewer of the drama of mountains visited and stimulates the imagination. Described in literature as the bones of the earth, the rocks in this garden can symbolize the Five Sacred Mountains of China. The rocks here are limestone boulders—Taihu rocks, the most prized of garden rocks for their shape, size and color.  If craftsmen were not satisfied with a rock, they did not hesitate to improve upon nature’s handiwork; after sculpting a rock would be left in water for an indefinite time to erode and age and cure.

Plants:

The bamboo plants represent moral purity and are plentiful in Chinese gardens.  Bamboo symbolizes the ability to stay strong in the midst of adversity—bamboo will bend easily in the wind but rarely breaks. It is hard, but hollow; lightweight, yet strong; utilitarian, yet graceful.

Rarely does one find flowers in a Chinese garden. If anything, we might see a few azaleas in the spring and perhaps some exotic orchids in the summer.

Water:

Water is indispensable in Chinese gardens, endowing the landscape with a visual and an aural treat. The viewer appreciates the delightful picture created by flowing water, but the sound is lilting and soothing to the ears and contributes to the air of serenity. The Chinese speak of water as nourishing, enriching and restorative.

Calligraphy/Literature:

Quotations from Literature are an essential feature of the garden court and denote the scholar’s own  preoccupation.  Poems which tend to be brief, suggestive and non-intellectual abound.

Conclusion:
The Astor Court epitomizes the Chinese artist’s ideal—to achieve harmony through identity with the rhythms of the natural world.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Hearn, Maxwell: Gallery Talk to Highlights Trainees, March 5, 2001 (from class notes transcribed by Alix Devine).

Murck, Alfreda and Wen Fong:  “The Astor Garden Court and Ming Room”. Period Rooms in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 1996.
————“A Chinese Garden Court:  The Astor Court at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: MMA Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 3, Winter 1980-81.
Click here to continue the tour to the American Wing to see Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emmanuel Leutze.

Though I also take visitors to see the gigantic painting of Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emmanuel Leutze, my friend and fellow-Docent Elizabeth Kahn Kaplan, is an expert on the canvas. I would prefer to let her research speak for itself. My thanks are due to Liz for sharing her wonderful insights into this seminal work with me. The essay that follows is based on Liz’s findings.

WASHINGTON CROSSING THE DELAWARE

Researched  and written by Elizabeth Kahn Kaplan
Painted in 1851 by
Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze (1816-1868)

Oil on canvas; 149 x 255 in. (378.5 x 647.7 cm)
Signed and dated, lower right: “E. Leutze./Dusseldorf 1851”
Accession number:  97.34
Gift of John Stewart Kennedy, 1897
Location:  American Paintings, Gallery #223, Second Floor,      American Wing, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Before us is the largest framed painting at the Metropolitan Museum of Art– Washington Crossing the Delaware — over 12 feet high and more than 21 feet long.  It is signed, lower right, “E. Leutze./Dusseldorf, 1851.”  The artist is a German-born American, Emanuel Leutze, who chose a grand theme to make a grand statement, on a grand scale. The lifesize central figure of General George Washington leads his ragtag army – composed of ordinary Americans, representing many different nationalities, as illustrated by their varied headgear, and more than one race – across the Delaware River from Pennsylvania to New Jersey. They will march in silence nine miles south through a blinding snowstorm to Trenton, to surprise and overcome a much larger number of hired German soldiers – the Hessians  – at their camp in Trenton. It is early morning, December 26, 1776, and the outcome of the battle to come will determine whether or not the cause of American independence will die that day.

The facts of the event:
In December of 1776, George Washington and his troops cross the Delaware River from Trenton to Bucks County, taking with them anything that might help the British in their pursuit. Following the manner in which war was fought at the time, each army went into winter quarters, the Americans in Pennsylvania and the British in New York and New Jersey. The British presence in Trenton is led by Colonel Johann Rall.

On December 25, Washington begins to cross the Delaware in the early afternoon. Ice in the river makes passage nearly impossible. It’s not until 4 am of December 26 that all of the army, including artillery, horses, and supplies, have crossed. In two groups — one along the Pennington Road and one along the river — the rebel forces march south.

On December 26, weary from a night spent responding to volleys from across the river in Morrisville, the Hessian soldiers sleep as General Washington sets his artillery at the northern entrance to Trenton. From this vantage, cannons can be fired down both King and Queen (today’s Warren and Broad) Streets. General Sullivan and his men fill the orchard behind the town’s barracks. As Sullivan begins shooting into the barracks building, Washington directs the cannon to open fire on King Street.

In short order the battle is over. Confusion reigns amongst the Hessian men. So total is Washington’s surprise attack that the Hessian leaders cannot even organize their men into cohesive action. Attempts are made to rally to the northeast and to the south. Over 900 Hessian soldiers are captured; another 150 die from their wounds, including the commander, Colonel Johann Rall. Washington and his men, along with their prisoners, return to their Pennsylvania quarters

Leutze began the painting some two generations after the event depicted.  Mid-nineteenth century America was enjoying rapid growth and industrialization, making its mark among nations, and Americans were looking back at their beginnings with tremendous admiration of the Revolutionary War patriots and a worshipful regard of George Washington, both as general and first President.  At the same time, the young nation was torn by tremendous friction between north and south over the issue of slavery — a division that would result in Civil War a decade later. The Black man in Leutze’s painting is meant to represent the MANY Black soldiers present at Washington’s crossing of the Delaware. Scholars have found that even New Hampshire, with a tiny population, had at least 180 Black male residents that served in the Revolution, most in the Continental Army, but others in the militia, the Navy, and aboard privateers. Oarsmen from Marblehead, Massachusetts under the leadership of Colonel John Glover who extricated the Patriot forces from Brooklyn after the Battle of Brooklyn Heights, rowed Washington’s forces across the Delaware River to engage the Hessians at the Battle of Trenton. The Marblehead regiment, in which so many seamen served, undoubtedly included many Blacks. Leutze’s inclusion in the boat of a black man makes clear his stand on the Free-Soil issue that divided his countrymen in the late 1840s. Both north and south revered George Washington, and Leutze hoped to remind Americans of his struggle to create the new nation, and how much would be lost if differences could not be settled peacefully.

Washington employed a largely ragtag army of volunteers and the tactics of guerrilla warfare to defeat the world’s most feared military power. His maneuvers to escape direct confrontation would be studied years later and serve as a model for Ho Chi Minh’s field commanders in Vietnam.  He exhibited the temperament for leadership in war and in peace.

This is American history painting as Mythology – as the artist wanted us to see it.  A traditional “history painting,” it depicts a contrived and exaggerated moment in history. History painting combines portraiture and action painting and requires a great deal of research.  The work provided psychological support for both Germany’s ongoing revolution in the late 1840s-early 1850s, as well as sending a strong message to Americans:  Hold onto the union; it’s too precious, created by the sacrifice of heroes.

The noble intention of every history painting is to provide inspiration.

The style is highly representative of a school of Romantic painting that flourished in Dusseldorf, where Leutze was living when he painted this picture in 1851. History painting was the highest calling for an artist; it combined portraiture with action painting; it required research.

Leutze used a number of elements to express this emotional, patriotic message.  The painting is a masterpiece of composition. The central grouping forms a large triangle, with the flag at the apex and the boat as its base; the pole of the man on the left defines that side of the triangle, leading our eyes upwards to Washington and then to the flag; our gaze descends along the right side of the triangle towards the man rowing at the stern. Leutze spotlights two elements central to his theme:  1), the steadfast leadership of a determined George Washington, who would become the first president of the new nation, and 2), that this event would culminate in separation from England, symbolized by the almost erect flag of the new nation.  It is held securely, and shielded, by 18 -year old Lieutenant James Monroe, as he struggles to keep the flag aloft as an inspirational symbol for the troops.  He would be wounded in the battle, be elevated to Lieutenant Colonel, and  live to become the fifth president of the United States.
Almost the entire upper half of the painting is suffused with light, surrounding and keeping our attention on these two main aspects – Washington and the flag.

Worthington Whittredge, one of the American artists present while Leutze was working in Germany, posed for the figures of both Washington and the steersman. The face was modeled on a cast of Jean-Antoine Houdon’s life mask of Washington.

The source of light is interesting. Leutze oriented his painting so that we face south as we look at the subject, in contrast to the usual placement of north at the top.  Pennsylvania is to the west behind them, with New Jersey ahead, to the east.  The little ship, crowded with symbolism, heads to the first light of a new winter dawn in the southeastern sky. It glows behind the two figures; had Leutze reversed the boat on the canvas, we would be facing north as we look at them, where the sky would still be dark.  This light is unnaturally bright around the head; it shines on the right side of Washington’s face, (Jean-Antoine Houdon’s death mask of Washington was the model for it) outlining his profile and casting little light on the side facing us. A second source of light shines on the face of the soldier in brown. It is the same light surrounding the central group, and casts a shadow on the water in the foreground – a distortion of nature by the artist.  Having light reflect off their bodies into the water, with painted shadows, gives a three-dimensional form to the figures, since our eyes know that when an object both reflects light and has a shadow it must also have volume. Without reflections and shadows, the figures would seem flat and two-dimensional. The sky is enhanced with a red, white, and blue rainbow behind the flag, heightening our emotional reactions to the painting.  And, if you look closely toward the dawn-suffused sky, a morning star is shining – another symbol of a bright new day.

Red encircles and highlights the foreground — as an accent on the men’s uniforms and other clothing reflected in the water, and to a lesser extent on the clothing of the men in the second boat in the background.  Colors fade in the distance, giving perspective to the painting.

Depicting motion is a technique painters use to keep our attention focused on the picture.  We know the boat is in motion; the oars are pointing in different directions; the boat rocks as it struggles against the wind, the currents, and water filled with menacing ice floes splashing against the boat. We know the boat is making headway because the oarsmen are struggling to keep the boat on course.  The flag, too, is moving, blown by the wind or the boat’s propulsion forward.  Only one element does not move:  Washington stands erect, resolute, focusing his thoughts on the future, not on the worries of the moment.

Leutze uses our sense of proportion to underline the precariousness of the men and the moment. The boat is far too small for the twelve men and the flag it carries.  In reality Washington used a Durham boat, much larger and carrying 30 to 40 people.  By decreasing the size of the boat relative to the figures inside, Leutze concentrates our attention on the physical struggle of the soldiers.

Leutze’s use of perspective creates an illusion of depth on the flat canvas surface. Objects and people in the background are smaller than those in the foreground. Colors are much brighter in the foreground; the second boat and its contents are painted duller shades to indicate distance.   Leutze’s use of atmospheric perspective is masterful. The atmosphere in the background accounts for the softening of details and diminishing of light and dark contrasts.  An atmospheric haze indicates the distance of the opposite shore.  There are no sharp contrasts or outlines; the faraway boats fade in the distance just as they would in reality.

Also to heighten our perception of depth, the upraised arm of the oarsman near the front of the boat is foreshortened; even his right arm seems a little shorter than it would have been if it was extended straight down instead of at an angle toward the viewer.

Leutze uses thick paint and choppy brush strokes for the ice; less so for the boat – we can see the grain of the wood. Smooth brush strokes create a seamless sky, with colors blended into a soft glow.  We are looking at the work of an artist in full control of his craft, fully achieving his objective.

Leutze also painted George Washington at the Battle of Monmouth, The Storming of the Teocalliby Cortez and His Troops (1848) now at the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford, CT, and Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way, which hangs in the U.S. Capitol.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

I. Books and Catalogues

Boatmer, Mark M. III, Encyclopedia of the American Revolution. New York: David McKay Company, Inc., 1966.

Catton, Bruce, Editor, The American Heritage Book of the Revolution. New York: American Heritage Publishing Co., 1958

Dann, John C., ed., The Revolution Remembered: Eyewitness Accounts of the War for Independence.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980,

Dwyer, William M., The Day Is Ours!: November 1776-January 1777: An Inside View of  the Battles of Trenton and Princeton (How a Ragged Rebel Army Stood the Storm and Saved the Revolution. New York: The Viking Press, 1983

Fast, Howard, The Crossing. New York: William Morrow & Company, 1971
The Hessian: A Novel. New York: William Morrow & Company, 1972

Fischer, David Hackett, Washington’s Crossing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Frank, Sid, & Melick, Arden Davis, The Presidents Tidbits & Trivia.  NY: Hammond Inc. 1984.

Franklin, John Hope, From Slavery to Freedom: A History of African Americans, p.77

Freeman, Douglas Southall, George Washington. (six volumes)

Gallagher, John J., The Battle of Brooklyn 1776.  1995

Groseclose, Barbara S., Emanuel Leutze, 1816-1868: Freedom Is the Only King. Washiington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1975

Howat, John K., Washington Crossing the Delaware.  Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, vol. XXVI, 1968 (March), pp. 289-299.

Ketchum, Richard M., Divided Loyalties: How the American Revolution Came to New York. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 2002.Livingstons vs. Delanceys.

Lecke, Robert, George Washington’s War: The Saga of the American Revolution. New York: Harper Collins Publishing Company, 1992.

Library of Congress: The Papers of George Washington, Washington, vol. iv. p. 364
Logan, Rayford W., and Winston, Michael R., ed.  Dictionary of American Negro Biography, p.643

Lowell, Edward J., The Hessians And The Other German Auxiliaries Of Great Britain In The Revolutionary War. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1884

McCullough, David, 1776. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005.

McPhillips, Martin, The Battle of Trenton: Turning Points in the American History Series.
Morristown, N.J.: Silver Burdett Company, 1985.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art GUIDE, 2nd edition. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1994, p. 24.

Mitnick, Barbara, ed., George Washington: American Symbol. New York: Hudson Hills Press and The Museums at Stony Brook, 1999.

Randall, William Sterne, George Washington: A Life. New York: Henry Holt & Company,1997.

Raphael, Ray, A People’s History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: The New Press, 2001.

Rogers, Joel A., Africa’s Gift to America, p.107, 110-111

Schecter, Barnet, The Battle for New York: The City at the Heart of the American Revolution. New York: Walker and Company, 2002

Spassky, Natalie, and others, American Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, volume II, pp. 16-24.  Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1985.

Styker, William S.  The Battles of Trenton and Princeton,1898

Wallace, William M., Appeal to Arms: A Military History of the American Revolution. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951.

Other books:
Groseclose, Barbara, Emanuel Leutze 1816-1868, Freedom is the Only King. Washington : Published for the National Collection of Fine Arts by the Smithsonian Institution Press : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1975.

About John Glover and/or the Marblehead Mariners
Beattie, Donald W., and Collins, J. Richard, Washington’s New England Fleet.
Billias, George Athan, General John Glover and his Marblehead Mariners
Smith, Phillip C. F., and Knight, Russell W., In Troubled Waters: The Elusive Schooner Hannah Waite, Henry E., Origin of the American Navy

II.  Metropolitan Museum of Art Gallery Talk
Schwarz, Alice, Education Department, Metropolitan Museum of Art/

III. Internet Web Addresses
http://tencrucialdays.com  Click on the links “Other Historic Sites” and “Other Links”

The Hessians
http://www.barracks.org/barracks.org/barracks/battle1.html

Prince Whipple and/or the Role of Blacks During the Revolution Seacoast NH Black History: Prince Whipple In American Painting.
http://www.seacoastnh.com/blackhistory/prince.html
http://www.seacoastnh.com/brewster/28.html
For the most up-to-date research about Prince Whipple (who is NOT depicted in Leutze’s painting) Write to: Valerie Cunningham, African American Resource Center
369 Greenland Rd, Portsmouth NH 03801

Click here to continue the tour to see the Autumn Landscape Window by Louis Comfort Tiffany.

The Autumn Landscape Window by Louis Comfort Tiffany

AUTUMN LANDSCAPE WINDOW
Researched by Rochelle Almeida

25.173
Artist:  Louis Comfort Tiffany
Leaded Favrille Glass
11 ft X 8 ft. 6 in.
Tiffany Studios, New York, 1923-24
Gift of Robert W. de Forest, 1925

Who was Louis Comfort Tiffany?
Louis Comfort Tiffany (1848-1933) embodied  the artistic spirit of America’s Gilded Age. He was the son of Charles Tiffany who founded the famous Tiffany store on Fifth Avenue, but declined the opportunity to follow his father into the family business in order to pursue his own artistic vision. The half century during which he worked in the decorative arts, i.e. from the 1870s to the 1920s, was a time of great experimentation, intense scrutiny of aesthetic ideals and gave rise to some of the century’s most exciting art movements, such as Art Deco and Art Nouveau, to all of which he contributed. Refusing to stay in one medium, Tiffany experimented vastly working with stained glass, enamel, jewelry, watercolor, metal, mosaic tile, etc. and was thus able to showcase his immense talents as a painter, architect and designer of interiors and landscapes

When was the window created and why?
The window was a private commission for the residence of Mr. L. D. Towle of Boston, Massachusetts, a real estate magnate and was meant to be housed in the Gothic style manor house that he was building outside the city. The style of the building dictated the Gothic tracery design of the window’s frame. It was meant to be installed on the second floor landing. Tiffany worked on the window between 1923 and 1924, but, unfortunately, Towle died bankrupt, shortly before the showpiece manor was completed and the window was never installed in his home. In due course, the Director of the Metropolitan Museum at the time, Robert W. de Forest, purchased it and then donated it to the new American Wing of this Museum.
Visual Details:
The scene depicted in the stained glass window is of a stunning autumn landscape, ablaze with the glowing colors and rich textures of the season. Considering that it was to be installed in Boston, it is appropriate that Tiffany chose to depict the grandeur of New England during its most spectacular season. The subject is a river that meanders at leisure through a valley. Mountains are visible in the distance and in the foreground, the woodland landscape dominates, notable for its foliage as much as for its rocks and tree trunks. The glow in the distance suggests sunset, that time of day when the earth is bathed in a golden softness and every conceivable autumn hue from burnished copper to blazing red from scorching yellow to tarnished rust is set on fire and enhanced by the sun’s dying rays. In that sense, the earth colors of the palette are contrasted by the vivid turquoise, almost purple, hues of the river.

Methods and Materials:
The window is made of a pane of Favrille or iridescent glass, united by striped of lead and encased in a wooden frame. Tiffany was doubtless influenced by the stained glass windows of European Medieval churches and monasteries. But he took the art of stained glass beyond its eccelesiastical setting and brought it into secular interiors, changing the essential nature of its subject matter which traditionally featured saints and scenes from the Bible and depicting instead Nature’s stunning possibilities. Thus, in this scene, he presents the woods in fall. In others, he has depicted the stillness of sheltered bays and the beauty of wisteria trailing over cottage eves.
Tiffany manipulated virtually every available type of glass and technique to give his window this extraordinary verisimilitude:
–Mottled glass creates intense sunlight filtered through yellow and green leaves.
–Confetti glass, so called because it is embedded with tiny paper-thin flakes of glass in different colors, adds realism to the foliage.
–Similarly, the boldly colored and marbleized glass simulates the gray and white boulders in the center and the striations on the white birch trees.
–Ripple glass evokes the movement of the water in the foreground.
–By plating several layers on the reverse, the artist created the impression of distant, misty mountain peaks.
Conclusion:
Louis Comfort Tiffany, through his studios and the vast numbers of artisans that were engaged in producing his designs, all of which he personally oversaw, created a massive inventory of decorative work, all of which has appreciated wildly with time and is highly valued today. This window is a fine testimony to Tiffany’s talents and skills as an artist and painter, designer and colorist.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:

MMA Bulletin. Special Issue on Louis Comfort Tiffany at the Metropolitan Museum. Summer, 1998.

Click here to continue the tour to see The Panorama of Versailles by John Van der Lyn